The first compelling thing you probably noticed in the title that gave you a rough idea of one of the points I could be attempting to make within this blog post is that the "free" market is not "free" in the true sense of the word. And you would be right. Now the way that this was implied was pretty clear was it not? Hence the quotations to indicate a sort of pseudo essence or reality of the word(s) in context right? Now the question arises would you have understood this nuanced subtlety of style in conveying a point if you had not been raised or taught in school that "this means this". The answer would be simply no because there would be no background or frame of reference other than the technical reference for what the punctuation signifies in common writing for you to make an inference about a potential point to be made or explored within the body of this writing. So therefore your background essentially determined your "freedom" in this instance whereas your "freedom" is essentially the quality of your framework.. Now this framework for which you have been programmed with to eventually put everything you see, hear, and taste within it in order to make sense of it, does not embody freedom within and of itself. It is subject to many factors that could,make it much less free in comparison to others ie. Crucial words, concepts, and illustrations could have been missing which inhibited you from coming to a very basic logical conclusion on a simple yet important topic. This does not equal freedom regardless. This is more like freedom=dependent or =entirely dependent on the quality, thoracity, and flexibility for which the framework was constructed wherein the,subject will always be bound by these parameters unless he she makes moves,on their own to,expand. All of these situations create clear defined boundaries, mesh points, glue points, and ultimately future outcomes which can be predicted to a T given that it is based on an initial all encompassing design to start with wherein this design clearly creates the future of its subjects in every way conceivable since everything those subjects see, feel, speak, touch, and interact with is based upon that initial framework with all of it flaws and all of its perfections.
This is exactly why and how there is no real "free" market in fact because all of its participants are perceivably conducting "free choice" are actually only seeing, acting, and choosing within the framework with which they were designed which actually indicates that every "free choice" can be predictably programmed to occur in exact specificity every time on time. This is not real "free choice". If a mentally challenged low iq person were challenged with some hard math problems and were not able to answer them correctly, was that their choice that they chose to be mentally challenged and get it wrong? No. It was simply an outflow of the framework in which they were brought up with, and lies in this is the discrepancy between frameworks because they are not created equal. Essentially the inequality of these frameworks collectively is what decides that there is no such thing as freedom as the discrepancy between your styles and movements is preprogrammed to keep ypu divided. And if human beings are not Equal in all ways then they cannot be free because the inequality in their initial framework structures will divide and conquer every free choice as if these battles are filled with honorable conviction based on "real" stuff. All is just preprogrammed bullshit.
Now we have talked,about how people that are not equal in their framework design in quality, thoracity, and effectiveness leads to everything becoming precisely predictable down to a T. As long as there are discrepancies in the quality given towards each piece of,the network, there remains inequality in The totality of the design. And as long inequality is existent within even a fraction of the framework, there will be no free choices.
If the market is built upon groups of people and those groups of people have been preprogrammed with all sorts of,various,levels,of,vocabulary math acne business,avumen, etc. Then you essentially have inequality that is self perpetuating. And each signatory of allowance expresses the next version of separation very well. And each point of separation serves as the precursor for the next.
Thus overall we see the consequences of denial in practice as every outflow that leads one to conclude on a very rudimentary level that this predesign is the law and truth of the land as the appearance of inequality as fact when it actually is the law of equality in action showing that for every action there is an equal and proportionate reaction.
No comments:
Post a Comment