There is a very simple question and a very simple response? The world is in disaster because the world is not in accordance with what is best for all life on this planet. When the world is in accordance with what is best for all life on this planet then the world will inevitably improve because it is actually in our own self-best-interest to create that very thing. A world that is best for all inevitably will produce a world that is best for all. Makes sense. A system that is guaranteed to support everyone will guarantee to support everyone equally and with dignity. So lets stop the madness of profit - no profit - can exceed the capacity of life that is here on this earth - no profit can exceed what is the most prominent exception of what is best for all on this earth - no profit can exceed what is the most important objective that is here - to create something that lasts and something that will in evitably produce something worth experiencing - a world without pain and without suffering.
Saturday, September 1, 2012
How Google Owns the World
Google is the product of the world system but it holds the key to any social endeavor that we as whole may ever partake in. Google is everything. It has its hands in everything we do. Youtube is owned by google. Anybody who has google as an email is in the hands of a company that is dominant in web browsing and web viewing via mainly google and google news. Google is the company that is surveying every piece of data on the web is controlling every piece of data on the web - it holds the power of the viewer - the viewer of information that is vital and controlling every aspect of our lives. What information is controlling every aspect of our lives? It is the desteni material? It is controlling every aspect of our lives because information is only relevant when it is in the best interest of all that is involved. See google is in control of the world because information controls the world which inevitably means that many who see the information that is available is personally subject to this information. This information can be in the interest of all life. That is what Desteni is standing for - information and freedom for all life on this planet. It is in the interest of everyone of us to establish and implement an Equal Money System. This is because the world is not in every one's interest at this point as many are based in only self-interested ideas but not the interest of what is best for all. Nationalism is insane and most partake. Economy is insane but most see that the world is not in everyone's interest and change must take place.
The Failed Economy
The econmy has failed to supply enough jobs for all. When half the world does not have jobs then an economic system has utterly failed to provide the sustenance in the form of incoming money to all of its participants.
The Equal Money System can be designed to give everybody the jobs they want. We can design this system to give everybody jobs that they would like to have and therefore give not only a secure job but the sustenance of a job they like to work in.
So lets give everybody the sustenance they deserve through supplying enough jobs for everybody and jobs that people like to work in. Currently the system is in the process of accessing whether or not the four years of work required for the Equal Money System is enough to establish the support that is necessary for all to live a dignified life.
The Equal Money System can be designed to give everybody the jobs they want. We can design this system to give everybody jobs that they would like to have and therefore give not only a secure job but the sustenance of a job they like to work in.
So lets give everybody the sustenance they deserve through supplying enough jobs for everybody and jobs that people like to work in. Currently the system is in the process of accessing whether or not the four years of work required for the Equal Money System is enough to establish the support that is necessary for all to live a dignified life.
Beauty and Deception
I would like to point out the deception of beauty even existent within a blog supposedly trying to 'debunk' beauty or expose how women are subject to manipulation from media advertisements telling them how they should look.
The blog starts with the author expressing concern for the effect of beauty advertisements has on women saying that these can lead to "depression, insecurity, and even committing suicide".
The blog displays a picture saying "Girls see over 400 advertisements per day telling them how they should look" written on the wall where a woman being portrayed as one who has accepted this within her self-appearance is standing next to it looking at her hair in a portable mirror.
The author begins to list a series of things wrong with these beauty advertisements: She states: "1. Girls, don't believe this kind of advertisements. 2. The majority of them aren't even real, don't you know what Photoshop can do?".
The first statement shows that she has potential to want to expose the nature of pre-programming within society and the concepts of beauty. But then she goes on to deceive the reader into believing that this image of beauty is actually valuable in that it is something that one would even want to attain in the first place. Instead of stating "you don't need to live up to these ideas/pictures of beauty in order for you to accept yourself and care about yourself" - she deceives the reader by making him/her feel better about themselves 'for having known that most of the photographs aren't even real photographs in that they are altered in some way to look like they do" all the while within doing that she is actually accepting the nature of the pre-programming that she is supposedly trying to expose or speak out against!
She goes on to state in her third counter statement: "3. Don't compare yourself to the women in these ads, half of them have eating disorders such as anorexia, since many of them only eat plain lettuce and water every week. Many of these women are going through depression. Don't become like one of them.". Within this statement she is accepting and allowing the idea that one must fulfill a certain image of beauty such as 'being thin' in order for one to accept themselves/embrace themselves. She uses the polarity of being really skinny vs. being really fat to denigrate the ones who are really skinny as a way to instill fear into the reader as in 'you don't want to be anorexic do you?'. This is deceptive because she is still accepting the premise the one should look 'thin' in order for one to accept themselves while using the polarity of becoming anorexic as way to scare the reader.Within stating "half of them have eating disorders" she is accepting the idea of beauty but is using fear as way to say 'you don't want to become like that'. Even within stating this she is accepting the idea 'that you want to become skinny' but you 'just don't want to become anorexic'. So using anorexia as an example she instills fear into the reader to 'not become anorexic'.
Her fourth statement goes on to say that one should embrace their size/shape: "4. Embrace your own shape and size, don't listen to what ads say, "lose weight, tips on losing weight, diets"... Blah blah blah.". Here she is appealing to some common sense wherein she is displaying the stupidity of diets.
Her fifth statement shows how she is still supporting the 'ideal body' but then concludes that it is 'impossible' , "5. It is absolutely impossible to achieve the ideal body that magazines portray; girls, these aren't real natural bodies.". Here she is appealing to the reader's sense of 'I want that body - I just don't know how I would get it'. Within that deceiving herself and the reader into actually believing that somebody would actually want to achieve that kind of body image.
Her sixth says, "6. Beauty=Personality, confidence, happiness and being you!". Ok so again here she is masking the desire tendency to want to be/look beautiful by saying 'its whats on the inside that counts!'. Again accepting the premise that one would want to be beautiful but it is 'just too hard to obtain' so therefore learn to 'just accept yourself'.
Her seventh is, "7. Barbie is just a doll!". Here she is accepting the picture presentation as 'not real' and therefore 'unattainable' all the while accepting the premise that one would ever want to obtain this 'perfect' picture presentation. She does not expose the deception within advertising she just accepts the premise that is 'unattainable' as a way to scare the reader from taking their addiction to beauty to the extreme. All the while not exposing that this idea of 'beauty' has been and still is the problem when it comes to women and their portrayal of themselves. She does not define beauty as self-acceptance but rather as 'personality, confidence, and being you' which is the exact same thing as saying 'be a pre-programmed robot who gives in to the exact ideas/fears that society has enstilled in you!'.
She does not say 'Beauty is reality and the reality is that beauty is a fallacy'. Instead she deceives by giving the reader reasons not to obtain beauty and thus live out their belief in a 'perfect' body image but hints to still retain one that is at least 'respectable'.
Join Desteni I Process where we learn to examine things critically wherein we can learn to expose a message being sent across that may not actually represent what is best for all or actually assisting anyone in overcoming their beliefs/opinions/ideas about the world and society.
www.equalmoney.org
www.desteniiprocess.com
www.desteni.org
The blog starts with the author expressing concern for the effect of beauty advertisements has on women saying that these can lead to "depression, insecurity, and even committing suicide".
The blog displays a picture saying "Girls see over 400 advertisements per day telling them how they should look" written on the wall where a woman being portrayed as one who has accepted this within her self-appearance is standing next to it looking at her hair in a portable mirror.
The author begins to list a series of things wrong with these beauty advertisements: She states: "1. Girls, don't believe this kind of advertisements. 2. The majority of them aren't even real, don't you know what Photoshop can do?".
The first statement shows that she has potential to want to expose the nature of pre-programming within society and the concepts of beauty. But then she goes on to deceive the reader into believing that this image of beauty is actually valuable in that it is something that one would even want to attain in the first place. Instead of stating "you don't need to live up to these ideas/pictures of beauty in order for you to accept yourself and care about yourself" - she deceives the reader by making him/her feel better about themselves 'for having known that most of the photographs aren't even real photographs in that they are altered in some way to look like they do" all the while within doing that she is actually accepting the nature of the pre-programming that she is supposedly trying to expose or speak out against!
She goes on to state in her third counter statement: "3. Don't compare yourself to the women in these ads, half of them have eating disorders such as anorexia, since many of them only eat plain lettuce and water every week. Many of these women are going through depression. Don't become like one of them.". Within this statement she is accepting and allowing the idea that one must fulfill a certain image of beauty such as 'being thin' in order for one to accept themselves/embrace themselves. She uses the polarity of being really skinny vs. being really fat to denigrate the ones who are really skinny as a way to instill fear into the reader as in 'you don't want to be anorexic do you?'. This is deceptive because she is still accepting the premise the one should look 'thin' in order for one to accept themselves while using the polarity of becoming anorexic as way to scare the reader.Within stating "half of them have eating disorders" she is accepting the idea of beauty but is using fear as way to say 'you don't want to become like that'. Even within stating this she is accepting the idea 'that you want to become skinny' but you 'just don't want to become anorexic'. So using anorexia as an example she instills fear into the reader to 'not become anorexic'.
Her fourth statement goes on to say that one should embrace their size/shape: "4. Embrace your own shape and size, don't listen to what ads say, "lose weight, tips on losing weight, diets"... Blah blah blah.". Here she is appealing to some common sense wherein she is displaying the stupidity of diets.
Her fifth statement shows how she is still supporting the 'ideal body' but then concludes that it is 'impossible' , "5. It is absolutely impossible to achieve the ideal body that magazines portray; girls, these aren't real natural bodies.". Here she is appealing to the reader's sense of 'I want that body - I just don't know how I would get it'. Within that deceiving herself and the reader into actually believing that somebody would actually want to achieve that kind of body image.
Her sixth says, "6. Beauty=Personality, confidence, happiness and being you!". Ok so again here she is masking the desire tendency to want to be/look beautiful by saying 'its whats on the inside that counts!'. Again accepting the premise that one would want to be beautiful but it is 'just too hard to obtain' so therefore learn to 'just accept yourself'.
Her seventh is, "7. Barbie is just a doll!". Here she is accepting the picture presentation as 'not real' and therefore 'unattainable' all the while accepting the premise that one would ever want to obtain this 'perfect' picture presentation. She does not expose the deception within advertising she just accepts the premise that is 'unattainable' as a way to scare the reader from taking their addiction to beauty to the extreme. All the while not exposing that this idea of 'beauty' has been and still is the problem when it comes to women and their portrayal of themselves. She does not define beauty as self-acceptance but rather as 'personality, confidence, and being you' which is the exact same thing as saying 'be a pre-programmed robot who gives in to the exact ideas/fears that society has enstilled in you!'.
She does not say 'Beauty is reality and the reality is that beauty is a fallacy'. Instead she deceives by giving the reader reasons not to obtain beauty and thus live out their belief in a 'perfect' body image but hints to still retain one that is at least 'respectable'.
Join Desteni I Process where we learn to examine things critically wherein we can learn to expose a message being sent across that may not actually represent what is best for all or actually assisting anyone in overcoming their beliefs/opinions/ideas about the world and society.
www.equalmoney.org
www.desteniiprocess.com
www.desteni.org
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)