Friday, August 9, 2019

Day 282 Andrew Yang and the Freedom Dividend

What Andrew Yang is proposing as a means to a Universal Basic Income not only makes sense logistically now but also takes into account the vast swath of change that could take place in our economy in the near future considering the doubling effect that technology is experiencing. This is why what he has been talking about is not only genius but probably the most revolutionary idea that has come forth to the mainstream considering the context of which it has come forth and the landscape of which it has come forth both in real terms and projected terms considering the landscape of where we've been, where we are, and where we are likely going. His "freedom dividend" proposal makes so much sense that its like a no brainer home run that almost everyone can get behind. The tech companies can be heralded to god like status which boosts their egos as well as giving their work actual real verifable relevance towards the social well being of all. The corporations and the fat cats can sell more stuff because all this from the tech industry will be directly given to the hands of people that already buy their stuff or maybe want to buy their stuff. And the average american would be called an idiot by their peers to not to accept an extra $1,000 per month for free if their boss handed it to them. And as a compounding result over time for those which this $1,000 is a conplete game changer in their lives and not only can they end up potentially saving where it was impossible, it might even boost them to make advances in their career and social circles that otherwise would not have happened thus skyrocketing them to making more money and saving more than they ever dreamed of faster than they ever dreamed of where they then may go on to do big and meaningful things that was either impossible before, seemed impossible before, and/or was an elusive pipe dream that seemed to pass them by as they scoundreled on the ground day in and day scraping by at their jobs with little leftover.

Also this addresses a fundamental principle between the relationship between technology and human beings and especially most importantly laying the foundation for a mutually beneficial relationship between more advanced AI that will develop in the future and us human beings. This will create a positive feedback loop between the humans not only programming of these AI as well the how the humans think about their programming of them and more importantly the inherent response to that programming which will become important whenever AI's become so sophisticated that humans may have a hard time distinguishing them from real people. This happens as follows: the AI's are programmed to do work that serves to provide for their fellow humans which makes them feel good, humans show grattitude for this work because it is not for me or you in isolation per se nor just the big wigs that own that robot that is serving us, their work is for the common welfare of all which makes them 'happy' because they see that we are 'happy' to see them. In this way they are avle to learn their most crushing deficit of which theu are aware of which is feel, show, and express grattitude and empathy.

This sort of basic underlying nuanced foundational architecture of AI's programming vice versa the humans programming in relation to them and the vortex of exchange in between them in the process and over time is extremely subtle yet critically important whenever we are essentially bringing alongside us a fully capable and dynamic species that could decide to use us to accomplish their means as opposed to the means of what is best for all, not just humans, and not just themselves. This positive feedback loop allows for a building of a relationship that is beneficial for all as that relationship is being developed in its early stages and throughout its life span. This is critical to get right in the beginning as the two most dangerous things to either an AI or a human being is either themselves or each other. It is very important that that relationship gets off to a good start so that both in unison can realize their potential in working together for the greater good of all and not just themselves. With this positive feedback loop humans will be much more emotionally attached to AI rather than physically which will allow the AI to explore and delve into that side of the human as well reflectively reaching some of that within themselves through that exposure and interaction. Laying a foundation that is either with non aligned incentives or worse a large barrier from the onset based on a negative or abusive past could completely inhibit the two being able to reach these realms of communication which could spell disaster for both our survivals. This intimate exchange between AI and human counterparts will be vital in their development in reaching a point of relatability which will facilitate relationships between AI and humans where they can show each other and help one another while understanding that their incentives align towards the greater good of all rather than just what is best for themselves in isolated self interest based on a negative past, and laying a solid foundation that is mathematically
Sound to produce a win win that aligns to both parties incentives wherein even those incentives are aligned and an understanding that each has their own drawbacks or weaknesses so to speak but that that they are here to support one another and grow together in this journey we call life.

This is able to be accomplished through this positive feedback loop between "AI" or "Robots" connecting to in the humans minds, "helping me put food on the table" or "changed all of our lives for the better" and "is apart of the greater good for all" or "is what is best for all". So in this process the human being will also be taken on a journey of self discovery of understanding what is best for all is what is best for them and vice versa because once the scarcity mindset has been alleviated or eradicated with the help of technology, robots, and AI through the form of a freedom Dividend that they will collectively help to provide, then the human will start to think a little differently and their incentives will still align to their self preservation to an extent but it wont be 'all they exist as' as they do currently. Perhaps showing and feeling grattitude will be the AI's strong suit and will help the humans develop this more within themselves.

Saturday, August 3, 2019

Day 281 Darwinism Means We Decide

Darwinism Means We Decide


Money is the most important thing in the world but its not the end all be all of everything in the world. Its simply a tool. Given to all unconditionally makes more sense than every individual chasing after the same goal in isolation, separation, and ruthless competition with one another. Can the darwinians get past the idea that were set in stone and that theres nothing we can do about it! Darwinians of all should at least acknowledge the fact that since we are the most advanced species with regards to not only technical abilities and also communication that this would give us as a species the ability to decide and build 'how the world works' and 'how things are going to be' rather than sitting back in complacency and laziness thinking that we are not able to change the current paradigm we live under while our position in the hierarchy is clearly that of 'god' if you will or the decider of how things are going to be? This is the problem with the belief in higher powers because this excuses the most dominant species on earth from taking responsibility for what happens on earth because its 'up to god'. Hah! Can you see the fallacy? I mean dont get me wrong there is a god and he is very real but his or her interventions will be sparse and selective. Its mainly up to you and us..after all thats what Darwinism is telling us anyway....isnt it? :)


Thursday, July 18, 2019

Day 280 Final Hand of The 2019 WSOP

Final Hand of the 2019 World Series of Poker

The breakdown of this hand and the psychology behind is pretty straight forward. Dario Sammartino flops a flush draw. Hossein Ensan has pocket kings. Ensan bets 15 million for just under half the pot of 33 million. Dario calls hoping to realize the equity of a potential flush. However the odds were just out of his favor for calling ensans bet size to get his suited card. Dario misses and ensan fires again. This time dario in fear of revealing a weak hand that needs more to complete goes all in even though he obly has roughly a 30 percent chance of completing any hand that can beat ensans pocket kings. Dario was wreckless and could taste a glorious victory a little too early....

Da

Thursday, July 4, 2019

Day 279 The Key To Texas Hold Em Poker

The Key To Texas Hold Em Poker

" it doesnt matter so much what you have, but more what your opponent has, then you can adjust your play based off of that" phil ivey

The key is reading your opponents and trying to gauge/guess what they have in their hand the best you can. All other strategies are secondary to this. This is 90% of the game. People get caught up in the odds because its easier to focus on the math and try to give yourself an exact step by step solution for every situation. But this only counts 1 out of 50 hands. And if you play so tight you only bet on 1 out of 50 hands your opponent already has you beat. Playing for pots gets you the green. Playing to flip over winners gets you the brown. The challenge of poker is wading through the mystery well enough to make it less mysterious. The way one goes about wading through the mystery is everything. Seeking certainty through mathematics works if youre a computer but youre still not playing against one.